Political Boundary Disputes in Geography

Political Boundary Disputes in Geography

Since the year 2000, the Latin Americas political boundary disputes in geography among its neighboring countries have resulted into the use of vigor. These events involved 10 of the 19 independent states of Central and South America. In year 1995, Peru and Ecuador went into war that resulted in over a thousand injuries and deaths as well as large economic loss. Through its international standards, the US states were reasonably having freedom for interstate war throughout the 20th century. The Latin Americans in most parts don’t hesitate to attack and declare violence to their neighbors. They never expect their states to be involved into war through one another.

The paper on political boundary disputes in geography seeks to explain the strange cluster of features into the hemisphere. This includes the boundary, territorial and some dispute endure.

Solving that puzzle can help to point out the ways to more effective resolution and prevention of conflicts regarding territory and borders. Some of the most serious and longest-lasting boundary disputes at South America were settled since year 1990. The boundary disputes in Central America and all of its neighbors have also been settled despite that their conflicts become worst. All of these 2nd set of States have been largely involved in a militarized interstate conflict since 1990. The Nicaragua had been on top of the list, as it had militarized conflicts with 4 states. Honduras and Venezuela have both militarized conflicts with 3 neighboring countries. Colombia as well as Guyana, together with Guatemala and El Salvador have all militarized conflicts with 2 neighbors. Since year 1990, militarized interstate conflicts have become common. Only the conflicts between Peru and Ecuador have resulted to war in 1995.

This paper on political boundary disputes in Geography contends that the international systems structure in Central and South America and their fairly distant relations with the worldwide system and the panoply of processes as well as institution evident into inter-American relations discuss the short duration and infrequency of interstate wars. This paper has specifically explained the arguments on interstate war, which was become rare because of the balanced of authority that was developed at South America in the end of the 19th century.

The political boundary disputes in Geography to the states of Central and South America have been uncommon and the interstate war to both places have stayed rare as they were somewhat insulated from a wider international method.

Comments are closed.